Michael Savage on Reality of Embryonic Stem Cell Research – Aired on March 9, 2009
Michael Savage on Reality of Embryonic Stem Cell Research – Aired on March 9, 2009
Last Updated on Tuesday, 28 December 2010 10:33 Written by Administrator Tuesday, 28 December 2010 10:33
Michael Savage on Reality of Embryonic Stem Cell Research – Aired on March 9, 2009
Video Rating: 4 / 5
So, Nancy Reagan, a huge supporter of embryonic stem cell research, is an abortion racketeer then?
oran6es (6 days ago)
Human embryonic stem cell research is de facto human slavery and human cannibalism. Plain and simple.
—————————
Try Catholic Mass – pure cannibalism.
Betcha didn’t think of THAT one.
It’s YOU! you are the hateful ones. “Right wing lunatics” are considered “hateful” by idiots likes you because we don’t put up with your stupid views.
Slavery: total subjugation of one group of human beings over another, ownership of human beings.
Cannibalism: consuming one’s own.
Human embryonic stem cell research is de facto human slavery and human cannibalism. Plain and simple.
Google “pictures of a teratoma” and see for yourself the horror of human experimentation.
I don’t get how right wing lunatics are so hateful to 90% of people but they are so concerned about a stupid cell in a petri dish.
Nice choice of words, “I believe the word….. like you is hypocrite.” I believe “belief” is too mis-skewed to prove a point with no support. Examples: “I believe God exists” “I believe dog’s rule the wold”. Beliefs are innocent opinions that are often tolerated in society. Poor choice of words.
Yes I use attack strategies without knowing their meaning. Funny. Also “Communish starts as socialism” that is mincing words. First off socialism is a type of economic/political idea, it does NOT mean it leads to communism. Second where have I minced words, the researched sounded happy when she was talking about the wonders of Adult stem cells. I too study all sides, then come to the most probably answer. What historical figure is he emulating? Enlighten me.
“likes to lie” Hey you just minced words… I believe the word for people like you is HYPOCRITE.
Where have I minced words? Are you just someone that uses attack stratagies without knowing their meaning?
Communism starts as Socialism, because people don’t accept sudden change. The do accept being broken down to slow change overtime.
No surprise on your own minced words.
You are the one ignoring semantics here your probably not even smart enough to notice what historical figures he is truly emulating. Once again, I don’t mince words I investigate all sides and then come to my answer.
Listened to the “Stem cell” researched likes to lie, massively. Embryonic stem cells cause benign tumors, not cancer. And second adult stem cells have only been proven in blood forming cell lines, no other type of adult stem cell has been found.
Funny, he’s introducing communish, but starting it as socialism. So he’s using socialism first, how is he introducing communism. Obviously you like to mince words. I too can mince words, observe: “All republicans are hypocrites because they don’t want government involvement, but they do want the government to stop gay rights.” See how I used minced words there. If you going to ignore semantics then yes Obama is communist, and to add he’s also introducing dogism, the belief that dogs are god.
No need to re research, because you missed the point. Obama is introducing communism, but starting it as socialism. Think about what he’s been saying at the G20! Do your research before attacking mine.
For example:
Communism like quality: A piece of terrains belongs to everyone equally and with out commerce.
Socialism: A piece of terrain can be sold, usually in the form of a house, to anyone. Notice how profit is involved in this economy, but it is restricted from saying “Oh blacks cannot buy a home because …”
Please do your research again, Communism comes from Socialism. But the different between the two is that in Communish, no one owns anything. Everyone owns everything a common ownership. Meaning there is 0 profit for any product. In Socialist societies it is the equal and fair distributing while providing a FAIR compensation for the products.
Actually Republicans fillabuster on issues involving constitutional preservation. Democrats fillabuster for social issues, because they want the constitution to become more convienant. Also adopting a communist tradition of just getting your way.
Obama is a communist. Study basic economics and you will see that Communism is the final form of socialism. It will work at first, but as time progresses more and more will be controlled by govt. eventually you’ll be shot for dissent.
Anyways republicans are also infamous for their filibusters, often stopping legislative pieces for the well being of the masses by threatening to filibuster.
Also in 2005 the Democratic party filibustered against Bush’s judicial nominations (usually on the subject of the war/torture/other subjects). I see no problem w/ such filibustering like this. Filibusters is something both Democrats and Republicans enjoy, and as such cannot be used against one another.
Communist dictatorships? Who’s a communist? Obama is leaning more on the socialist agenda then a idiotic communist agenda. Anyways Socialism appears to be working so far, but it is still by far too early to tell. We won’t see results for a year or two.
So you admit I was right, in 2005 Congress was under Republican control? Also, in the House, Dems couldn’t filibuster since only a simple majority is needed. And in the senate, it was 55 Repubs and 44 Dems. Yet you say it was a liberal congress. So using your logic, do we now have a conservative congress since Dems have less than 60 in the Senate?
How pathetic. Yes congress had a slight republican majority in 2005. But once again you failed to note the fillabustering that haulted that majority. Since less than 60% of our legislative branch was republican, the fillabusters the whiny democrats got their way.
You fail again little girl.
Was Congress under Republican control in 2005?
Answer yes or no, if you’re a man.
I didn’t ignore any facts ditz. I simply pointed out that congress was arrested in 2005 because of the democrats cowardly fillabuster in the senate. Didn’t you ever take a civics class?
Are you really so uninformed that you’ll follow this guy just because he had a good speech writer and his penis size?
I can’t believe someone like you actually tries to debate with almost zero facts.
Grow up and try again in about 5 years little girl.
Wake up and smell the toxic waste already!
So you ignore facts about Congress being under Republican control in 2005, yet I’m the one that needs to wake up?
Sure buddy. Whatever you say. LOL.
Your problem is that you need to wake up.
Sure sure. Whatever helps you sleep at night.